recycling, not downcycling
With the Tijdelijke Rechtbank Amsterdam, De Prinsenhof and Zuiderstrandtheater, Lagemaat and cepezed realised a nice string of circular projects in a short time, according to Vincent Gruis (TU Delft/ Transitieteam Circulaire Bouweconomie). “Too often in the Netherlands, despite the ambition to focus on circularity, there is still ‘downcycling’ rather than ‘recycling’.” According to Gruis, these three projects show how it should be done. They are technically innovative, but perhaps even more important, he believes, is the innovative collaboration. “Two extremes on the line, the designer and the demolisher, come full circle here.”
something insane devised
Circular construction is good for significantly reducing emissions, depletion and waste, Gruis lists. And it has an appealing cost tag, says Arjen Kapteijns, alderman for sustainability in The Hague. “That's four birds with one stone.” Today, his counterpart from Oss Dolf Warris, alderman for Culture and Climate Adaptation, says he is especially appalled. “We came up with something insane, something I have wondered more than once if it would work. And, yes! Today it turns out that it will.”
opportunities for society
Building a brand new theatre would have been neither easier nor cheaper, both councillors emphasise. Because the cost of materials and labour is currently uncertain, while with this building you know what it costs and that it is good, the venue has already proven itself. Moreover, “we simply have the task of dealing with materials in a circular way, says Kapteijns. Warris thinks the beauty of circular building is that through a different way of thinking, you treat each other differently. “Circularity also offers opportunities to society,” he says.